White paper on crime 2011 Part4/Chapter6/Section4/2
Table 4-6-4-2 shows, with respect to probationers/parolees whose probation/parole supervision terminated within the period between 2001 and 2010, the percentage of those who received criminal dispositions, etc. due to repeat offenses during the probation/parole supervision period (limited to those who received the final judgment during the period in case of having been prosecuted) (redisposition rate), the percentage of those whose probation/parole supervision was revoked due to violation of their conditions for probation/parole supervision or for repeat offenses (revocation rate), and the percentage of those falling under either one of these cases (those falling under both cases count as one person) (revocation/redisposition rate).
The revocation rate and the revocation/redisposition rate were both on a declining trend with both probationers and parolees, while the redisposition rate was also on a declining trend with probationers. The redisposition rate of parolees, however, was extremely low when compared with their revocation rate. The primary reason for this is that although parolees who repeat offenses are subject to criminal trials in most cases their judgments rarely become final before the end of their parole supervision period because of the period being fairly short.
Table 4-6-4-3 shows the status of revocation of parole/suspension of execution of the sentence with probation of those who were newly placed under probation/parole supervision during the period between 2001 and 2010.