White paper on crime 2010 Part4/Chapter4/2
Fig. 4-4-2 shows the percent distribution of juvenile probationers (excluding those placed under short-term probation for traffic offenses; hereinafter the same in this chapter) and juveniles newly admitted to juvenile training schools in 2009 by history of the protective measures. Juveniles with a history of protective measures accounted for approximately 20% of juvenile probationers and approximately 65% of juveniles newly admitted to juvenile training schools.
Table 4-4-3 shows the number of juvenile probationers and juveniles newly admitted to juvenile training schools with a history of protective measures (refers to those who had previously been placed under protective measures; hereinafter the same in this subsection) by type of delinquency in 2009. The percentage of juveniles with a history of protective measures was high for Poisonous and Deleterious Substances Control Act violations, Road Traffic Act violations, and assault, in that order, among juvenile probationers. In the case of juveniles newly admitted to juvenile training schools the proportion was high for Road Traffic Act violations, Poisonous and Deleterious Substances Control Act violations, assault, breaking into a residence, and extortion, in that order.