White paper on crime 2015 Part1/Chapter3/Section2/2
Fig. 1-3-2-2 shows the trends of persons referred to public prosecutors for obstruction of compulsory execution (as stipulated in Articles 96-2, 96-3, and 96-4 of the Penal Code after its amendment by the Act No.74 of 2011), obstruction of public auctions (as stipulated in paragraph 1, Article 96-6 of the Penal Code after its amendment by the Act No.74 of 2011), and bid-rigging (as stipulated in paragraph 2, Article 96-6 of the Penal Code after its amendment by Act No.74 of 2011), and violations of the Bankruptcy Act (Act No.75 of 2004).
Fig. 1-3-2-3 shows the trends of persons referred to public prosecutors for the violations of the Commercial Code (Act No. 48 of 1899, prior to the amendment by the Act No. 87 of 2005)/Companies Act (Act No.86 of 2005, went into force on May 1, 2006), the Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade (here in after “Anti-Monopoly Act”, Act No. 54 of 1947), and the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act (Act No. 25 of 1948. The Act was titled “Securities and Exchange Act” prior to the amendment on September 30, 2007).
Fig. 1-3-2-4 shows the trends of persons referred to public prosecutors for violations of the Act Regulating the Receipt of Contributions, Receipt of Deposits and Interest Rates (hereinafter “Investment Act”, Act No. 195 of 1954) and the Money Lending Business Act (Act No. 32 of 1983. The Act was titled “Loan Business Control Act” prior to the amendment on December 19, 2007).